↓ Skip to main content

Simulation Methods for an Abductive System in Science

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Science, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Simulation Methods for an Abductive System in Science
Published in
Foundations of Science, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10699-007-9113-8
Authors

T. R. Addis, D. C. Gooding

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 23%
Philosophy 2 15%
Computer Science 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#89
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,579
of 156,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them