| Title |
The effects of temperature on the machining of metals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Shaping Technology, March 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02834790 |
| Authors |
O. W. Dillon, R. J. De Angelis, W. Y. Lu, J. S. Gunasekera, J. A. Deno |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 45% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 1999.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Shaping Technology
#2
of 4 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,550
of 15,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Shaping Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them