↓ Skip to main content

The chromosomal distribution of the major and minor satellite is not conserved in the genusMus

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The chromosomal distribution of the major and minor satellite is not conserved in the genusMus
Published in
Chromosoma, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01731129
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. K. C. Wong, F. G. Biddle, J. B. Rattner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 1997.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#185
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,469
of 15,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them