↓ Skip to main content

Impaired Face Processing in Autism: Fact or Artifact?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Impaired Face Processing in Autism: Fact or Artifact?
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-005-0050-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boutheina Jemel, Laurent Mottron, Michelle Dawson

Abstract

Within the last 10 years, there has been an upsurge of interest in face processing abilities in autism which has generated a proliferation of new empirical demonstrations employing a variety of measuring techniques. Observably atypical social behaviors early in the development of children with autism have led to the contention that autism is a condition where the processing of social information, particularly faces, is impaired. While several empirical sources of evidence lend support to this hypothesis, others suggest that there are conditions under which autistic individuals do not differ from typically developing persons. The present paper reviews this bulk of empirical evidence, and concludes that the versatility and abilities of face processing in persons with autism have been underestimated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Netherlands 4 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 330 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 23%
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 82 23%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 187 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 7%
Neuroscience 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 61 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2009.
All research outputs
#5,966,112
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,209
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,789
of 160,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.