↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and cellular glucose metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Interactions between mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and cellular glucose metabolism
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00204-015-1520-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dania C. Liemburg-Apers, Peter H. G. M. Willems, Werner J. H. Koopman, Sander Grefte

Abstract

Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and detoxification are tightly balanced. Shifting this balance enables ROS to activate intracellular signaling and/or induce cellular damage and cell death. Increased mitochondrial ROS production is observed in a number of pathological conditions characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction. One important hallmark of these diseases is enhanced glycolytic activity and low or impaired oxidative phosphorylation. This suggests that ROS is involved in glycolysis (dys)regulation and vice versa. Here we focus on the bidirectional link between ROS and the regulation of glucose metabolism. To this end, we provide a basic introduction into mitochondrial energy metabolism, ROS generation and redox homeostasis. Next, we discuss the interactions between cellular glucose metabolism and ROS. ROS-stimulated cellular glucose uptake can stimulate both ROS production and scavenging. When glucose-stimulated ROS production, leading to further glucose uptake, is not adequately counterbalanced by (glucose-stimulated) ROS scavenging systems, a toxic cycle is triggered, ultimately leading to cell death. Here we inventoried the various cellular regulatory mechanisms and negative feedback loops that prevent this cycle from occurring. It is concluded that more insight in these processes is required to understand why they are (un)able to prevent excessive ROS production during various pathological conditions in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 366 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 21%
Student > Master 49 13%
Researcher 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 86 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 87 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,947,033
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,903
of 2,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,390
of 266,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.