| Title |
Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-011-9839-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan G. Schwartz, Anne M. Neubauer, Thomas E. Fagan, Niels J. Noordhoek, Michael Grass, John D. Carroll |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 25% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 46% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#151
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,962
of 119,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.