Title |
S-PIV comparative assessment: image dewarping+misalignment correction and pinhole+geometric back projection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00348-005-1000-x |
Authors |
F. Scarano, L. David, M. Bsibsi, D. Calluaud |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 50 | 79% |
Energy | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#158
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,540
of 57,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.