Title |
Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: A review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, January 1986
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02030737 |
Authors |
Jean-Luc Boulnois |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 205 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 26% |
Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
Researcher | 31 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 37 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 43 | 20% |
Engineering | 40 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 14% |
Chemistry | 15 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,680,234
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#288
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,145
of 42,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them