↓ Skip to main content

Initial Conditions and the ‘Open Systems’ Argument against Laws of Nature

Overview of attention for article published in Metaphysica, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Initial Conditions and the ‘Open Systems’ Argument against Laws of Nature
Published in
Metaphysica, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12133-007-0019-2
Authors

Clint Ballinger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 8%
Portugal 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 31%
Social Sciences 3 23%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,956,103
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Metaphysica
#4
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,060
of 71,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metaphysica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them