↓ Skip to main content

Complications of Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Complications of Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment: A Review
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0618-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor M Ilizaliturri

Abstract

Recent developments in hip arthroscopy techniques and technology have made it possible in many cases to avoid open surgical technique for treating pincer-type and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and rather treating it arthroscopically. Early reports suggest favorable results using arthroscopic techniques. The frequency of complications reported for hip arthroscopy for all indications is generally less than 1.5%, suggesting the procedure is safe. Little information is available on complications directly related to the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Failure to recognize and treat or incompletely reshape impingement deformities may be the most frequent cause for a second hip arthroscopy and redébridement of the deformity. There has been no report of avascular necrosis related to the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement; only one femoral neck fracture after arthroscopic cam remodeling has been reported in a large series of patients. Other clinical concerns include hip dislocation secondary to extensive capsulotomies or overresection of the anterior acetabular rim in the case of pincer impingement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 173 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 60 32%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 65%
Engineering 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,456,080
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#670
of 7,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,109
of 181,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.