↓ Skip to main content

Statistical mechanics and the ontological interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Physics, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Statistical mechanics and the ontological interpretation
Published in
Foundations of Physics, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02058636
Authors

D. Bohm, B. J. Hiley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
China 1 4%
Unknown 19 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 35%
Mathematics 3 13%
Chemistry 2 9%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Physics
#310
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,297
of 27,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Physics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.