| Title |
Morphological analysis of a deep‐sea whelk Buccinum tsubai in the Sea of Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fisheries Science, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01033.x |
| Authors |
Akira IGUCHI, ITO Hiroharu, UENO Masahiro, Tsuneo MAEDA, Takashi MINAMI, Isao HAYASHI |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 59% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#148
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,605
of 68,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.