Title |
The European Pollen Database: past efforts and current activities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00334-009-0215-9 |
Authors |
Ralph M. Fyfe, Jacques-Louis de Beaulieu, Heather Binney, Richard H. W. Bradshaw, Simon Brewer, Anne Le Flao, Walter Finsinger, Marie-José Gaillard, Thomas Giesecke, Graciela Gil-Romera, Eric C. Grimm, Brian Huntley, Petr Kunes, Norbert Kühl, Michelle Leydet, André F. Lotter, Pavel E. Tarasov, Spassimir Tonkov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Estonia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 101 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 29 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2009.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#213
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,483
of 112,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them