Title |
Analysis of Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Solids from Their X-Ray Diffraction Patterns
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11095-006-9086-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Bates, George Zografi, David Engers, Kenneth Morris, Kieran Crowley, Ann Newman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
Ireland | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 392 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 21% |
Researcher | 67 | 16% |
Student > Master | 49 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
Other | 66 | 16% |
Unknown | 89 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 98 | 24% |
Materials Science | 61 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 36 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 6% |
Engineering | 24 | 6% |
Other | 60 | 15% |
Unknown | 107 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,023
of 2,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,675
of 67,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.