↓ Skip to main content

“Dueling” ESI: Instrumentation to study ion/ion reactions of electrospray-generated cations and anions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
“Dueling” ESI: Instrumentation to study ion/ion reactions of electrospray-generated cations and anions
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, June 2002
DOI 10.1016/s1044-0305(01)00364-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Mitchell Wells, Paul A. Chrisman, Scott A. McLuckey

Abstract

Novel instrumentation has been developed which allows for the sequential injection and subsequent reaction of oppositely-charged ions generated via electrospray ionization (ESI) in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. The instrument uses a DC turning quadrupole to sequentially direct the two ion polarities into the ion trap from ESI sources which are situated 90 degrees from the axial (z) dimension of the trap, and 180 degrees from one another. This arrangement significantly expands the range of ionic reactants amenable to study over previously-used instrumentation. For example, ion/ion reactions of multiply-charged positive ions with multiply-charged negative ions can be studied. Also, reactions of multiply-charged ions with singly-charged ions of opposite polarity that could not be generated by previously used ionization methods, or that could not be efficiently injected through the ion trap ring electrode, can be studied with the new instrument. This capability allows, for example, the charge state manipulation of negatively-charged precursor and product ions derived from proteins and oligonucleotides via proton transfer reactions with singly-charged cations generated by ESI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
France 1 5%
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 55%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,226
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,702
of 126,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.