| Title |
Abatement technology investment and emissions trading system: a case of coal-fired power industry of Shenzhen, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10098-014-0854-0 |
| Authors |
Ying Huang, Lei Liu, Xiaoming Ma, Xiaofeng Pan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 21% |
| Engineering | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
#96
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,510
of 254,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them