↓ Skip to main content

Natural radionuclides in soil near a coal-fired power plant in the high background radiation area, South China

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Natural radionuclides in soil near a coal-fired power plant in the high background radiation area, South China
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4501-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoqing Liu, Qi Luo, Mingxia Ding, Jiangping Feng

Abstract

In this study, soil samples around Mawan coal-fired power plant (CFPP) in Shenzhen, a high background radiation area in South China, were analyzed for natural radionuclides. The activity concentration of (226)Ra, (232)Th, and (40)K in soils around Mawan CFPP ranged from approximately 72 to 358 Bq kg(-1) (averaged 204 Bq kg(-1)), 118 to 432 Bq kg(-1) (averaged 265 Bq kg(-1)), and 101 to 2168 Bq kg(-1) (averaged 1269 Bq kg(-1)), respectively, being found to be significantly higher than the world range values. The levels of these radionuclides in soil largely decreased with increasing distance from the CFPP, indicating a technologically enhanced natural radiation near the CFPP. The Raeq values for the soil samples around Mawan CFPP ranged from 346 to 878 Bq kg(-1), most of which exceeded the allowed maximum Raeq value of 370 Bq kg(-1). The operating of CFPP has increased the total radioactive dose received for the nearby population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#555
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,498
of 267,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.