↓ Skip to main content

An encounter frequency account of how experience affects likelihood estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
An encounter frequency account of how experience affects likelihood estimation
Published in
Memory & Cognition, July 2009
DOI 10.3758/mc.37.5.632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie A. Obrecht, Gretchen B. Chapman, Rochel Gelman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 35%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 67%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Linguistics 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,187
of 110,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.