You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoiding Unintended Outcomes from REDD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01391.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oscar Venter, James E.M. Watson, Erik Meijaard, William F. Laurance, Hugh P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2010.
All research outputs
#2,636,096
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,367
of 3,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,659
of 189,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#24
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.