↓ Skip to main content

Attention-Like Deficit and Hyperactivity in a Drosophila Memory Mutant

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention-Like Deficit and Hyperactivity in a Drosophila Memory Mutant
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.4516-09.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno van Swinderen, Björn Brembs

Abstract

The primary function of a brain is to produce adaptive behavioral choices by selecting the right action at the right time. In humans, attention determines action selection as well as memory formation, whereas memories also guide which external stimuli should be attended to (Chun and Turk-Browne, 2007). The complex codependence of attention, memory, and action selection makes approaching the neurobiological basis of these interactions difficult in higher animals. Therefore, a successful reductionist approach is to turn to simpler systems for unraveling such complex biological problems. In a constantly changing environment, even simple animals have evolved attention-like processes to effectively filter incoming sensory stimuli. These processes can be studied in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, by a variety of behavioral and electrophysiological techniques. Recent work has shown that mutations affecting olfactory memory formation in Drosophila also produce distinct defects in visual attention-like behavior (van Swinderen, 2007; van Swinderen et al., 2009). In this study, we extend those results to describe visual attention-like defects in the Drosophila memory consolidation mutant radish(1). In both behavioral and brain-recording assays, radish mutant flies consistently displayed responses characteristic of a reduced attention span, with more frequent perceptual alternations and more random behavior compared with wild-type flies. Some attention-like defects were successfully rescued by administering a drug commonly used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in humans, methylphenidate. Our results suggest that a balance between persistence and flexibility is crucial for adaptive action selection in flies and that this balance requires radish gene function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 7 4%
United States 5 3%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 171 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 41%
Neuroscience 43 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Psychology 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 20 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,289,505
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#1,950
of 24,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,320
of 174,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#7
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.