You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Common Genetic Variation Near the Phospholamban Gene Is Associated with Cardiac Repolarisation: Meta-Analysis of Three Genome-Wide Association Studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006138 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ilja M. Nolte, Chris Wallace, Stephen J. Newhouse, Daryl Waggott, Jingyuan Fu, Nicole Soranzo, Rhian Gwilliam, Panos Deloukas, Irina Savelieva, Dongling Zheng, Chrysoula Dalageorgou, Martin Farrall, Nilesh J. Samani, John Connell, Morris Brown, Anna Dominiczak, Mark Lathrop, Eleftheria Zeggini, Louise V. Wain, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Mark Eijgelsheim, Kenneth Rice, Paul I. W. de Bakker, Arne Pfeufer, Serena Sanna, Dan E. Arking, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Tim D. Spector, Nicholas D. Carter, Steve Jeffery, Martin Tobin, Mark Caulfield, Harold Snieder, Andrew D. Paterson, Patricia B. Munroe, Yalda Jamshidi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 34 | 36% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Professor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 12% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,877
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,115
of 109,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#243
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.