↓ Skip to main content

Risk and protective factors for mental health at a youth mass gathering

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Risk and protective factors for mental health at a youth mass gathering
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00787-018-1163-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tegan Cruwys, Alexander K. Saeri, Helena R. M. Radke, Zoe C. Walter, Charlie R. Crimston, Laura J. Ferris

Abstract

Mass gatherings are well-documented for their public health risks; however, little research has examined their impact on mental health or focused on young people specifically. This study explores risk and protective factors for mental health at mass gatherings, with a particular focus on characterising attendees with high levels of psychological distress and risk taking. Data collection was conducted in situ at "Schoolies", an annual informal week-long mass gathering of approximately 30,000 Australian school leavers. Participants were 812 attendees of Schoolies on the Gold Coast in 2015 or 2016 (74% aged 17 years old). In both years, attendee mental health was found to be significantly better than population norms for their age peers. Identification with the mass gathering predicted better mental health, and this relationship became stronger across the course of the mass gathering. Attendees with high levels of psychological distress were more likely to be male, socially isolated, impulsive, and in a friendship group where risk taking was normative. Mass gatherings may have a net benefit for attendee mental health, especially for those attendees who are subjectively committed to the event. However, a vulnerable subgroup of attendees requires targeted mental health support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 25 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 31 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,683,393
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#179
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,448
of 325,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.