| Title |
Identification of Iron Transporters Expressed in the Magnetotactic Bacterium Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Microbiology, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00284-008-9305-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Azuma Taoka, Chihiro Umeyama, Yoshihiro Fukumori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#492
of 2,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,582
of 92,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.