↓ Skip to main content

Estimating and testing zones of abrupt change for spatial data

Overview of attention for article published in Statistics and Computing, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Estimating and testing zones of abrupt change for spatial data
Published in
Statistics and Computing, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11222-009-9151-x
Authors

Edith Gabriel, Denis Allard, Jean-Noël Bacro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Mathematics 2 18%
Engineering 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Statistics and Computing
#150
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,357
of 93,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics and Computing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.