↓ Skip to main content

Reply to: Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for endometriosis: any conclusive evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Reply to: Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for endometriosis: any conclusive evidence?
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00404-015-3780-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantinos A. Zorbas, Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, Nikos F. Vlahos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Computer Science 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,537
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,753
of 267,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.