↓ Skip to main content

Beak length analysis of arrow squidNototodarus sloanii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in southern New Zealand waters

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Beak length analysis of arrow squidNototodarus sloanii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in southern New Zealand waters
Published in
Polar Biology, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02329211
Authors

George D. Jackson, Jean F. McKinnon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 5%
Mexico 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 60%
Environmental Science 4 20%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#599
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,203
of 26,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.