↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
405 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, June 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02059810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Gershenzon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Mexico 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 268 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 53 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Environmental Science 22 8%
Chemistry 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 59 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#743
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,644
of 21,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.