| Title |
The dynamics of nutrient utilization and growth of apple root stock ‘M9 EMLA’ in temporary versus continuous immersion bioreactors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Growth Regulation, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10725-006-9115-5 |
| Authors |
D. Chakrabarty, Y. H. Dewir, E. J. Hahn, S. K. Datta, K. Y. Paek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 39% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Plant Growth Regulation
#89
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,834
of 156,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Growth Regulation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.