↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for Empirically Assessing the Fairness of a Lineup

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, January 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines for Empirically Assessing the Fairness of a Lineup
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, January 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf01039807
Authors

Gary L. Wells, Michael R. Leippe, Thomas M. Ostrom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 86%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#471
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,179
of 26,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.