| Title |
Riccardo Poli, William B. Langdon, Nicholas F. McPhee: A Field Guide to Genetic Programming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10710-008-9073-y |
| Authors |
Michael O’Neill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 88% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 88% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,567,528
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#43
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,219
of 180,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.