↓ Skip to main content

Plant Histology as an Aid in Squirrel Food-Habit Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, July 1939
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant Histology as an Aid in Squirrel Food-Habit Studies
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, July 1939
DOI 10.2307/3796113
Authors

Luther L. Baumgartner, A. C. Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 53%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#967
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them