| Title |
A sub-millimetric, 0.25 mN resolution fully integrated fiber-optic force-sensing tool for retinal microsurgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11548-009-0301-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iulian Iordachita, Zhenglong Sun, Marcin Balicki, Jin U. Kang, Soo Jay Phee, James Handa, Peter Gehlbach, Russell Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 86 | 65% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,699,921
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#230
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,680
of 95,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them