↓ Skip to main content

Faster Approximate String Matching

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Faster Approximate String Matching
Published in
Algorithmica, February 1999
DOI 10.1007/pl00009253
Authors

R. Baeza-Yates and G. Navarro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Other 16 36%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 80%
Mathematics 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 2 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#86
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,692
of 102,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them