You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Qualitative evaluation of a peer-based needle syringe programme in Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Drug Policy, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.12.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anh D. Ngo, Lucina Schmich, Peter Higgs, Andrea Fischer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Drug Policy
#2,128
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,811
of 172,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Drug Policy
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.