| Title |
On Unconditionally Secure Distributed Oblivious Transfer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cryptology, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00145-007-0327-2 |
| Authors |
Carlo Blundo, Paolo D'Arco, Alfredo De Santis, Douglas Stinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 14 | 67% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Design | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#89
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,752
of 68,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.