| Title |
Epidemiology and Natural History of Urinary Incontinence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001920070021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Hunskaar, E. P. Arnold, K. Burgio, A. C. Diokno, A. R. Herzog, V. T. Mallett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,863,582
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#177
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,439
of 37,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them