↓ Skip to main content

A Study of Heating Duration and Scanning Path in Focused Ultrasound Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
A Study of Heating Duration and Scanning Path in Focused Ultrasound Surgery
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10916-010-9463-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dehui Li, Guofeng Shen, Hui Luo, Jinfeng Bai, Yazhu Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 38%
Computer Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#284
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,890
of 95,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.