↓ Skip to main content

BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in patterns of neural activation in individuals with MDD and healthy controls

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in patterns of neural activation in individuals with MDD and healthy controls
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danuta M. Lisiecka, Erik O’Hanlon, Andrew J. Fagan, Angela Carballedo, Derek Morris, John Suckling, Thomas Frodl

Abstract

Rs6265 single nucleotide polymorphism, which influences brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in the cortical and subcortical brain structures, may result in distinguished patterns of neural activation during a major depressive disorder (MDD) episode. Valine homozygotes with high levels of BDNF and methionine carriers with lower levels of BDNF may present specific neural correlates of MDD. In our study we have tested differences in blood oxygen level dependant (BOLD) signal between individuals with MDD and healthy controls for both allelic variants. Individuals with MDD (N=37) and healthy controls (N=39) were genotyped for rs6265 and compared separately in each allelic variant for BOLD response in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment examining appraisal of emotional scenes. The two allelic variants were also compared separately for both individuals with MDD and healthy controls. In the homozygous valine group MDD was associated with decreased neural activation in areas responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional scenes. In the methionine group MDD was related to increased activation in subcortical regions responsible for visceral reaction to emotional stimuli. During an MDD episode methionine carriers showed more activation in areas associated with cognitive appraisal of emotional information in comparison to valine homozygotes. Small sample size of healthy controls carrying methionine (N=8). Our results suggest that allelic variations in the rs6265 gene lead to specific neural correlates of MDD which may be associated with different mechanisms of MDD in the two allelic groups. This may have potential importance for screening and treatment of patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#9,043
of 10,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,661
of 278,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#125
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.