↓ Skip to main content

Effects of non-native Melilotus albus on pollination and reproduction in two boreal shrubs

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Effects of non-native Melilotus albus on pollination and reproduction in two boreal shrubs
Published in
Oecologia, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3364-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie V. Spellman, Laura C. Schneller, Christa P. H. Mulder, Matthew L. Carlson

Abstract

The establishment of abundantly flowered, highly rewarding non-native plant species is expected to have strong consequences for native plants through altered pollination services, particularly in boreal forest where the flowering season is short and the pollinator pool is small. In 18 boreal forest sites, we added flowering Melilotus albus to some sites and left some sites as controls in 2 different years to test if the invasive plant influences the pollination and reproductive success of two co-flowering ericaceous species: Vaccinium vitis-idaea and Rhododendron groenlandicum. We found that M. albus increased the pollinator diversity and tended to increase visitation rates to the focal native plant species compared to control sites. Melilotus albus facilitated greater seed production per berry in V. vitis-idaea when we added 120 plants compared to when we added 40 plants or in control sites. In R. groenlandicum, increasing numbers of M. albus inflorescences lowered conspecific pollen loads and percentage of flowers pollinated; however, no differences in fruit set were detected. The number of M. albus inflorescences had greater importance in explaining R. groenlandicum pollination compared to other environmental variables such as weather and number of native flowers, and had greater importance in lower quality black spruce sites than in mixed deciduous and white spruce sites for explaining the percentage of V. vitis-idaea flowers pollinated. Our data suggest that the identity of new pollinators attracted to the invaded sites, degree of shared pollinators between invasive and native species, and variation in resource limitation among sites are likely determining factors in the reproductive responses of boreal native plants in the presence of an invasive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Unspecified 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 46%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Unspecified 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,205,434
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,895
of 4,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,295
of 264,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#27
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.