↓ Skip to main content

Reflectance based object recognition

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance based object recognition
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00128232
Authors

Shree K. Nayar, Ruud M. Bolle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 39%
Researcher 7 18%
Professor 7 18%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 28 74%
Engineering 8 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#399
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,265
of 26,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.