↓ Skip to main content

Development of porous media theories — A brief historical review

Overview of attention for article published in Transport in Porous Media, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 248)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Development of porous media theories — A brief historical review
Published in
Transport in Porous Media, October 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01039634
Authors

R. De Boer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 51%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 9%
Mathematics 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Transport in Porous Media
#49
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,341
of 19,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transport in Porous Media
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them