You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrocatalytic activity and stability of niobium-doped titanium oxide supported platinum catalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheng-Yang Huang, Prabhu Ganesan, Branko N. Popov |
| Abstract |
Predicting models of operative morbidity and mortality in the geriatric population are important in the prevention of adverse surgical outcomes. A retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients over 80 years of age who underwent gastrointestinal surgery from 1998 to 2008. 215 patients were identified with a mean age of 83.7 years. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 48.8 and 14.4%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that serum albumin levels [odds ratio (OR) = 0.367, p = 0.0267], postoperative pneumonia (OR = 3.471, p = 0.0101), hollow organ perforation or anastomosis combined with leakage (OR = 7.600, p = 0.0126), and preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (OR = 3.186, p = 0.0323) were significant predictors of hospital mortality. Moreover, albumin (OR = 0.270, p = 0.0002) and physical disability (OR = 3.802, p = 0.0009) were significant predictors of postoperative pneumonia, and albumin (OR = 0.491, p = 0.0212) and enterotomy (OR = 3.335, p = 0.0208) were significant predictors of surgical site infections. This study provides novel predicting models to identify the elderly surgical patients at high risk, who should receive more intensive preventive and perioperative care. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Researcher | 35 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 50 | 38% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 14% |
| Engineering | 17 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Energy | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#827
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,293
of 103,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.