↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogenation and Ring Opening of Aromatic and Naphthenic Hydrocarbons Over Noble Metal (Ir, Pt, Rh)/Al2O3 Catalysts

Overview of attention for article published in Catalysis Letters, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogenation and Ring Opening of Aromatic and Naphthenic Hydrocarbons Over Noble Metal (Ir, Pt, Rh)/Al2O3 Catalysts
Published in
Catalysis Letters, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10562-012-0810-8
Authors

Anne Piegsa, Wolfgang Korth, Fehime Demir, Andreas Jess

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Student > Master 6 22%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 37%
Chemical Engineering 7 26%
Engineering 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Catalysis Letters
#190
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,248
of 161,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catalysis Letters
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.