| Title |
Photochemical synthesis and characterization of Ag/TiO2 nanotube composites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-007-2387-y |
| Authors |
Haibin Li, Xuechen Duan, Guocong Liu, Xiaoqi Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 23 | 35% |
| Materials Science | 14 | 22% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,617
of 80,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.