↓ Skip to main content

Marine Reserves Enhance the Recovery of Corals on Caribbean Reefs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
694 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Marine Reserves Enhance the Recovery of Corals on Caribbean Reefs
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Mumby, Alastair R. Harborne

Abstract

The fisheries and biodiversity benefits of marine reserves are widely recognised but there is mounting interest in exploiting the importance of herbivorous fishes as a tool to help ecosystems recover from climate change impacts. This approach might be particularly suitable for coral reefs, which are acutely threatened by climate change, yet the trophic cascades generated by reserves are strong enough that they might theoretically enhance the rate of coral recovery after disturbance. However, evidence for reserves facilitating coral recovery has been lacking. Here we investigate whether reductions in macroalgal cover, caused by recovery of herbivorous parrotfishes within a reserve, have resulted in a faster rate of coral recovery than in areas subject to fishing. Surveys of ten sites inside and outside a Bahamian marine reserve over a 2.5-year period demonstrated that increases in coral cover, including adjustments for the initial size-distribution of corals, were significantly higher at reserve sites than those in non-reserve sites. Furthermore, macroalgal cover was significantly negatively correlated with the change in total coral cover over time. Recovery rates of individual species were generally consistent with small-scale manipulations on coral-macroalgal interactions, but also revealed differences that demonstrate the difficulties of translating experiments across spatial scales. Size-frequency data indicated that species which were particularly affected by high abundances of macroalgae outside the reserve had a population bottleneck restricting the supply of smaller corals to larger size classes. Importantly, because coral cover increased from a heavily degraded state, and recovery from such states has not previously been described, similar or better outcomes should be expected for many reefs in the region. Reducing herbivore exploitation as part of an ecosystem-based management strategy for coral reefs appears to be justified.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 694 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
Brazil 6 <1%
Mexico 6 <1%
Malaysia 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 626 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 139 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 20%
Researcher 128 18%
Student > Bachelor 87 13%
Other 44 6%
Other 90 13%
Unknown 68 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 317 46%
Environmental Science 204 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1%
Social Sciences 9 1%
Other 39 6%
Unknown 86 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2018.
All research outputs
#911,200
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,863
of 224,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,353
of 175,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#56
of 634 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 634 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.