| Title |
Influence of mild hyperglycemia on cerebral FDG distribution patterns calculated by statistical parametric mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12149-007-0099-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keiichi Kawasaki, Kenji Ishii, Yoko Saito, Keiichi Oda, Yuichi Kimura, Kiichi Ishiwata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#115
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,908
of 83,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.