↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of selected decay Basidiomycetes for selective biodefibrillation of Picea abies wood

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of selected decay Basidiomycetes for selective biodefibrillation of Picea abies wood
Published in
Mycological Progress, May 2002
DOI 10.1007/s11557-006-0010-2
Authors

Daniel Job

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 17%
Italy 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#172
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,014
of 121,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them