| Title |
Targeted genome engineering via zinc finger nucleases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Biotechnology Reports, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11816-010-0161-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seokjoong Kim, Jin-Soo Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,876,571
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Plant Biotechnology Reports
#19
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,024
of 184,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Biotechnology Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them