| Title |
Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: an agricultural prospect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-011-0406-z |
| Authors |
Anindita Mondal, Ruma Basu, Sukhen Das, Papiya Nandy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,896
of 110,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.