↓ Skip to main content

Difficulties in using Oswestry Disability Index in Indian patients and validity and reliability of translator-assisted Oswestry Disability Index

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Difficulties in using Oswestry Disability Index in Indian patients and validity and reliability of translator-assisted Oswestry Disability Index
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0230-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janardhana P Aithala

Abstract

In Indian patients, in view of language plurality and illiteracy, self-reporting of English version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is not practical. Our study aim was to find out to what extent self-reporting of ODI was possible and in cases where self-reporting was not possible, to see validity and reliability of a translator-assisted ODI score. Fifty patients with low backache and who could not use the English version were assessed with ODI with the use of two translators at a gap of 3 h in a test and retest manner. Patients were also asked to report the most important disabling activity in their day-to-day life. A total of 58 questionnaires were filled during the study period out of which eight patients (14 %) self-reported English version; while 50 patients needed a translator. The Cronbach's alpha between two translators for the ODI scores of 50 patients was 0.866, but aggregate of difference between two scores for each ODI component shows high difference between two translators for question nos. 3, 9, and 10. Cronbach's alpha was best when item no. 3 was deleted (0.875, translator 1; 0.777, translator 2). Thirty-seven people did not answer the question related to sexual activity. Agreement between two values was assessed using Kendall's tau and was found good (0.585, Spearman's coefficient 0.741). Kendall's tau values correlating total ODI score and individual components show that all the items move together, but correlation was poor for question no. 3 (P value 0.16 for translator 2). Translator-assisted ODI is a good outcome assessment tool in backache assessment in places where validated local language versions are not available, but in Indian patients, inclusion of question nos. 3 and 8 related to weight lifting and sexual function needs to be reviewed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 21%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Psychology 4 9%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 26%